MIB Discovery
1930 modules enregistrés
Chemin
MIX : 1 (iso). 3 (org). 6 (dod). 1 (internet). 2 (mgmt). 1 (mib-2). 16 (rmon). 23 (apm). 1 (apmMibObjects). 10 (apmReportTable). 1 (apmReportEntry)
OID : 1.3.6.1.2.1.16.23.1.10.1
TXT : iso. org. dod. internet. mgmt. mib-2. rmon. apm. apmMibObjects. apmReportTable. apmReportEntry
Enfants
Détails
OID1.3.6.1.2.1.16.23.1.10.1
Module APM-MIB (ietf)
NomapmReportEntry
Statuscurrent
DescriptionA conceptual row in the apmReportTable. The apmReportControlIndex value in the index identifies the apmReportControlEntry on whose behalf this entry was created. The apmReportIndex value in the index identifies which report (in the series of reports) this entry is a part of. The apmAppDirAppLocalIndex value in the index identifies the common application of the transactions aggregated in this entry. The apmAppDirResponsivenessType value in the index identifies the type of responsiveness metric reported by this entry and uniquely identifies this entry when more than one responsiveness metric is measured for a flow. Entries will only exist in this table for those combinations of AppLocalIndex and ResponsivenessType that are configured 'on(1)'. The protocolDirLocalIndex value in the index identifies the network layer protocol of the apmReportServerAddress. When the associated apmReportControlAggregationType value is equal to applications(4) or clients(2), this protocolDirLocalIndex value will equal 0. The apmReportServerAddress value in the index identifies the network layer address of the server in transactions aggregated in this entry. The apmNameClientID value in the index identifies the client in transactions aggregated in this entry. If the associated apmReportControlAggregationType is equal to applications(4) or servers(3), then this protocolDirLocalIndex value will equal 0. An example of the indexing of this entry is apmReportTransactionCount.3.15.3.1.8.4.192.168.1.2.3232235788 Note that some combinations of index values may result in an index that exceeds 128 sub-identifiers in length which exceeds the maximum for the SNMP protocol. Implementations should take care to avoid such combinations.